Post by Mairi on Jan 30, 2011 11:43:46 GMT -5
Dangers of Flash Photography in Relation to Spectral Beings:
The Photoelectric Work Function
The use of flash photography for paranormal investigation has
been a common practice for almost 100 years. Recently, within the
past few years the numbers of ghost investigators and hunters has
risen dramatically. Modern technology and the cheap cost of
photographic equipment has allowed for hunters to walk into
cemeteries or presumably haunted houses in droves to snap pictures.
Each person wanting the most spectacular picture to show to his or
her friends and associates. Until now this was an acceptable
practice, why not, were not hurting anyone.
Until Recently I too did this very same thing… For the past
couple of years I have been doing research into the Zero-point field
and Quantum Mechanical principles pertaining to spectral beings.
While doing this I stumbled upon the work of Millikan in 1916
involving the Photoelectric effect on elementary particles,
particularly electrons. As we all know a Spectral Sphere or orbs as
they are commonly known, have a measurable magnetic field usually
between 4 to 9 milligauss. Anytime you have a magnetic field there is
a electric field driving it, which is created by the movement of
electrons from an electrical current. This is where the problem
occurs, Millikan's work on Photoelectric Effect Data relates to light
ejecting electrons from the surface of a charged body.
The photoelectric work function (PWF) of 683nm is the
threshold for ejecting electrons from a charged body. Any wavelength
of light that has a wavelength shorter then the threshold will eject
electrons. The danger involved with taking pictures with flash
photography occurs when the flash is used. The flash of a modern
camera is usually a Xenon or Tungsten flash. These are used because
of the intensity of the light emitted from the camera for clear, well-
lit pictures. This intense light falls well within the spectrum of
the PWF, which almost certainly will cause electron emission from the
spectral body. This is a powerful statement because of the
implications involved with the well being of the spectral entity. To
put it simply, flash photography causes severe discomfort to non-
biological entities. Granted the injury is temporary, possibly a
fraction of a second before re-absorption can restore it to stasis.
Think of it as getting the wind knocked out of you!
An alternative to typical flash photography is Infrared (IR).
I use a simple, standard frame, 35mm, Pentax camera with an IR
emitting pin light. I load IR Film and use larger Infrared lights for
background lighting. Keep in mind not all cameras are good for IR
photography; some are not shielded and will allow IR to leak in from
joints of the frame or an unseated lens. IR does not cause electron
emission due to its longer wavelength. Instead it causes outer
electron molecular vibration (heating). Although the heating aspect
may not effect a Spectral Spheres structure I can confidently make
the statement, infrared light has shown no evidence of being
detrimental.
One of the surprising advantages of using IR is the spectacular
detail on the photo. This detail has allowed me to observe and
identify key elements that were previously unknown to me. These
elements have shown characteristics, which parallel the
characteristics studied in Quantum Electrodynamics and Stochastic
Electrodynamics; two fields of study that define the research in
modern Quantum Theory.
I write this article to try and persuade investigators, hunters and
researchers to change the way they collect evidence. Even if you
believe the information is inaccurate, do you want to take that
chance? These beings are not mindless balls of light that exist for
your entertainment or quest for fame and fortune. They have shown
intelligence in their interaction with investigators and everyday
people. If these words have fallen on deaf ears, if the words above
are thought to be fictional, think of this… What if the being you are
taking a picture of is your dead spouse, parent, grandparent or
child? Do you want to welcome them with what equates to a punch in
the stomach in the form of a photo flash? Needless to say, besides
convenience there is no real reason to use flash photography in the
collection of evidence.
Written by Frank D. Ratka Jr. CPI
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What are your Thoughts on this?
The Photoelectric Work Function
The use of flash photography for paranormal investigation has
been a common practice for almost 100 years. Recently, within the
past few years the numbers of ghost investigators and hunters has
risen dramatically. Modern technology and the cheap cost of
photographic equipment has allowed for hunters to walk into
cemeteries or presumably haunted houses in droves to snap pictures.
Each person wanting the most spectacular picture to show to his or
her friends and associates. Until now this was an acceptable
practice, why not, were not hurting anyone.
Until Recently I too did this very same thing… For the past
couple of years I have been doing research into the Zero-point field
and Quantum Mechanical principles pertaining to spectral beings.
While doing this I stumbled upon the work of Millikan in 1916
involving the Photoelectric effect on elementary particles,
particularly electrons. As we all know a Spectral Sphere or orbs as
they are commonly known, have a measurable magnetic field usually
between 4 to 9 milligauss. Anytime you have a magnetic field there is
a electric field driving it, which is created by the movement of
electrons from an electrical current. This is where the problem
occurs, Millikan's work on Photoelectric Effect Data relates to light
ejecting electrons from the surface of a charged body.
The photoelectric work function (PWF) of 683nm is the
threshold for ejecting electrons from a charged body. Any wavelength
of light that has a wavelength shorter then the threshold will eject
electrons. The danger involved with taking pictures with flash
photography occurs when the flash is used. The flash of a modern
camera is usually a Xenon or Tungsten flash. These are used because
of the intensity of the light emitted from the camera for clear, well-
lit pictures. This intense light falls well within the spectrum of
the PWF, which almost certainly will cause electron emission from the
spectral body. This is a powerful statement because of the
implications involved with the well being of the spectral entity. To
put it simply, flash photography causes severe discomfort to non-
biological entities. Granted the injury is temporary, possibly a
fraction of a second before re-absorption can restore it to stasis.
Think of it as getting the wind knocked out of you!
An alternative to typical flash photography is Infrared (IR).
I use a simple, standard frame, 35mm, Pentax camera with an IR
emitting pin light. I load IR Film and use larger Infrared lights for
background lighting. Keep in mind not all cameras are good for IR
photography; some are not shielded and will allow IR to leak in from
joints of the frame or an unseated lens. IR does not cause electron
emission due to its longer wavelength. Instead it causes outer
electron molecular vibration (heating). Although the heating aspect
may not effect a Spectral Spheres structure I can confidently make
the statement, infrared light has shown no evidence of being
detrimental.
One of the surprising advantages of using IR is the spectacular
detail on the photo. This detail has allowed me to observe and
identify key elements that were previously unknown to me. These
elements have shown characteristics, which parallel the
characteristics studied in Quantum Electrodynamics and Stochastic
Electrodynamics; two fields of study that define the research in
modern Quantum Theory.
I write this article to try and persuade investigators, hunters and
researchers to change the way they collect evidence. Even if you
believe the information is inaccurate, do you want to take that
chance? These beings are not mindless balls of light that exist for
your entertainment or quest for fame and fortune. They have shown
intelligence in their interaction with investigators and everyday
people. If these words have fallen on deaf ears, if the words above
are thought to be fictional, think of this… What if the being you are
taking a picture of is your dead spouse, parent, grandparent or
child? Do you want to welcome them with what equates to a punch in
the stomach in the form of a photo flash? Needless to say, besides
convenience there is no real reason to use flash photography in the
collection of evidence.
Written by Frank D. Ratka Jr. CPI
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What are your Thoughts on this?